left-image logo right-images
THE Online Political Journal for Liberals AND Conservatives

COUNTER-STRIKE

Unholy Complicity

by The Counselor

 

“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it.”
  
    - Hamas Charter, Preamble  18 August 1988

If nothing else, those who govern Gaza are direct. Actually, make that those who rule Gaza are direct, because, quite frankly, I’m not certain anything that Hamas does fits within even the most generous definition of governance.

Evidently loathe to alienate the attention deficit disorder community, Hamas smartly made their stated intent clear right away and chose not to risk diluting that essential message with any off-topic sentiments. Unnecessary, infidel-centric drivel like “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” was summarily excised by their editor’s scimitar. No sir. Hamas kept its preambles short and to the point.

That’s not to say, of course, that Hamas devoutly adheres to literary minimalism at all times. In fact, it generously expounded upon its preamble percept elsewhere in its charter, doing so with a bit of personifying flair: “The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews), where the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.” - Hamas Charter, Article VII.

Come to think of it, the whimsical world of talking stones and trees depicted in the Hamas Charter set the stage for Farfour the talking mouse, the star of the children’s show broadcast on Palestinian television, who so famously mimed the throwing of grenades and shooting of rifles while singing, “Oh Jerusalem, we are coming. Oh Jerusalem, it is the time of death.” Ah, the sweet innocence of childhood.

So, what do liberals do when Hamas unabashedly acts in accord with the proudly stated principles upon which it was verily founded? Naturally, they strain to re-interpret reality by projecting it through the opaque filter of moral relativism, so twisting and contorting logic in the process that even the most grizzled of Cirque du Soleil veterans takes pause to think, “wow, that’s just gotta hurt!”

Every time liberals, in the media and elsewhere, minimize the ghastly acts of Hamas by misdirecting their focus on the opined misdeeds of the Israelis, they are complicit in advancing Hamas’ cause. Lest we forget, again, that “cause” is the slaughter of the Jews and the destruction of Israel. Oh, and the definition of said “cause” is not up for debate or, as obfuscating liberals like to say, “interpretation;” rather, just read the charter. Or ask Farfour.

Liberals should be asking somebody for a quick history lesson because their tired mantra about how the Palestinians are simply trying to go return to their homeland, so rudely snatched from them and used to bring to life the figment of a Jewish state by guilt-ridden Europeans at the end of World War II, is a blatant fallacy. A quick flip through any history book published outside the Tehran city limits reveals that there has not been any singular or independent country known as “Palestine” … but only for the last 5500 years or so.

In fact, most of the current Middle Eastern nations, as well as those in northern Africa, can only trace their names and borders back to the past hundred years or so, and can attribute same to the cartographic whims of the English and French. So the whole Palestinian homeland argument really lacks historical foundation. Naturally, there are those who will insist on ignoring such inconvenient truths and adamantly cling to that particular specious line of thinking. To them I say: Take your placards and get in line behind those in the “Free Mesopotamia” crowd.

Key to the liberal sophistry concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the claimed need for Israel to negotiate, which is sometimes referred to among the non-intelligentsia as the “what have you done for me lately … no, I mean really lately” approach. Essential to this technique is the skill by which one is able to shift the starting point of the time period that frames the discussion so that the Palestinians are always the last ones to have made a concession, no matter how insignificant or how inconsistent it was with their prior acts.

Perhaps the larger question, though, is just how the Israelis are supposed to negotiate with an entity whose sole purpose in existence is the stated destruction of Israel. I’m not entirely certain where the compromise point is in that scenario, unless science has, unbeknownst to me, recently figured out how to make people half-dead.

The negotiation argument is even more laughable when one considers that Israel has been the only side actually giving up anything tangible in the discussions. Israel cedes territory and in exchange for the Palestinian promise not to murder quite as many Israelis. Over the years, Israel has given up portions of the West Bank and all of Gaza, and forcibly removed its citizen settlers in the process. In return, the Palestinians gave up the distant, strategically-undesirable locations for their Qassam rocket launch pads for more proximal sites from which they could hit targets much deeper into Israeli territory. Tough break, Hamas.

Other Arab nations support their so-called brothers in solidarity not with open arms in providing them a place to settle and prosper, but simply with arms, using them as pawns in their proxy war against the hated Israelis. No one disputes that weapons camouflaged as supplies are systematically smuggled into Gaza. Any rational nation even remotely interested in maintaining the security of its people would act to prevent such smuggling. Yet every time liberals blame Israeli blockades of supplies into Gaza for the lack of food or medicine available to the Palestinian people, they merely encourage Hamas to continue its tactic of sacrificing its people to gain international editorial support.

Even when Israel shows remarkable restraint … 2000 rocket attacks’ worth … before invading Gaza to stop the unyielding barrage of terror launched against its citizens, liberals focus instead on the inequitable casualty count. This serves only to redouble the will of Hamas to throw its citizens into the line of fire.

What the world should be doing is condemning and isolating Hamas for its every action. Yes, Virginia, there are bad guys, and Hamas should be called just that. After all, this is a group that purposely, and sometimes forcibly, herds women and children into the schools, hospitals and mosques from which it will launch attacks against the Israelis, eagerly anticipating the counterstrike that is sure to follow so it can parade the civilian casualties before the cameras of the fawning media in an attempt to curry favor and generate sympathy in the ethereal court of world opinion. Sick, yes. Sadly, successful too.


Share this article with

Digg   Reddit   Twitter   Facebook    Mixx    Propeller    Poprule   Fark  

FIRST STRIKE

The Unchosen: All Quiet on The Gaza Strip

by The Operative

 

“The past isn’t dead; it isn’t even past.”
                   -William Faulkner

A burnt red-orange sun hovers over the so-called Holy Land as the cease-fire brings momentary placidity, but the blood of a thousand dead infants, mothers, fathers, sons and daughters coarse through the cracked eternal veins of the Gaza Strip, remnants of the slaughter that has taken place between Israelis and Palestinians in recent weeks - all in the name of God.

Although one side calls Him Yahweh, and the other, Allah, it is very likely that each party’s casus belli is ironically based on defending the same Supreme Being, and their religious zealotry has done anything but lead to the spreading of God’s message, but, rather, has rendered an antipodal effect, because, to date, all this fervor of faith has yielded is the slaying of God’s children.

Reviewing the long and convoluted history of the Israel-Palestine territorial struggle leads one to conclude that both parties share culpability - both have acted immorally and aggressively, both have violated international law at one point or another. But what is disturbing is how the United States unquestioningly marches lock-step with Zionism, while ignoring objective information for over 30 years that fissures the a priori judgment of Israel’s moral superiority in this conflict, including actions this past November that actually triggered the Hamas assault.

Most disturbing is the fact that our policy may have caused more damage than good, including the fact that our persistent support of Israel might be part of the reason two planes crashed into and toppled twin steel giants in the middle of America’s Rome.

Politically, the U.S. supposedly has a dog in this fight, because it must protect a brother democracy that is perilously surrounded by menacing Islamic theocracies, although it’s fair to contemplate if Israel itself does not fall into the Judaic version of the latter class, for it operates more like a theocratic state, in relative terms, than a democratic republic, where the laws and principles of church and state are connaturally separated.  This commingling tendency was exposed recently by the Israeli Army’s Office of Chief Rabbi (the name of the office itself explains much, and a more befitting title just might be the Ministry of Religious Propaganda), in a pamphlet circulated prior to the most recent Gaza attacks, that compared Palestinians to the ancient Philistines, proffering the absurdity that Israel could learn from the military tactics of Samson and David.

U.S. policy towards this struggle has been transformed over decades by its own forms of religious fundamentalism. Although America is not a Christian state, it is certainly a nation of Christians, a reality not lost on our political leaders who must not only appease the Israel lobby, but are also beholden to Christofascists, a suiting moniker coined by Charlie Purcell, a modern liberal philosopher, to describe the Religious Right in America. Right-wing Christians are not dissimilar to the Islamofascists whom they so condemn, because they both have perverted religious teachings in a quest, not for heavenly peace, but for the ultimate worldly prize - pure, unadulterated power.

The reasons for Christian support of Israel are aplenty, including the obvious fact that Jesus was a Jew, and that Judaism and Christianity share the Old Testament, and that both believe Israel should kick ass and take names in King David fashion, and that both believe that the Jews have exclusive right to the Promised Land. According to a 2008 Joshua Fund survey, nearly 90 percent of evangelical Christians said they felt a “moral and biblical obligation” to back Israel. Thus, due to the nature of these rationales, U.S. policy has not only become seemingly unalterable, but, I dare say, sacrosanct. Even further, ironically, the policy has become as sacred as the religious misconceptions that caused this mess in the first place.

Yes, irony abounds in this bloody intersection of three monotheistic world religions due to a cataclysmic failure to live by the spiritual pillars of the faith each side is defending. What is even more amazing is the fact that these religions have more in common than many realize, having been born of the same God, are all Abrahamaic religions - with each faith claiming to be Abraham’s true descendants.  

In addition, a fact often overlooked, is that Islam was founded with the help of St. Gabriel, a character that has made cameo appearances in both the Old and New Testaments. When Gabriel visited Muhammad as a vessel of Allah in a cave on Mt. Hirah, he commanded Muhammad to recite what later became the Qur’an. The transcendent truth just might be that there is no “right” or “wrong” faith in this matter, and neither side is innocent in this conflict from a religious or political perspective.

Yet, this pattern of blind support continues to this day as we root on the home team. After Hamas fired rockets when the cease-fire expired in December, the Israelis retaliated with disproportionate airstrikes resulting in a glorious rout for the Chosen People by a score of over 1,300 to 13 deaths.

Even that subversive “liberal” media that supposedly loves all things terrorist is in on the act, as they comply with indicting Palestine as the sole inseminator of peccancy. But that is okay - because we all know that Palestine started it. Or did they?

It is intriguing to note how the Israelite modus operandi parallels the Bush administration’s tactics. The snapping of the six-month cease-fire that the worldwide media blamed on Palestine in December, actually began to unravel in the beginning of November when Israel special forces raided and killed 6 Hamas soldiers, “preventively”, in Bush Doctrine jargon, because the Hamas soldiers were digging a tunnel that “threatened” the state of Israel.

Interestingly enough, we put out of mind the immorality of the Israel blockade on Gaza that strangled lifelines for over half a million innocent Palestinian civilians, depriving them of basic needs such as healthcare, food, and electricity throughout the truce-in-name-only.

Not surprisingly, we fail to look hard at the political expedience of Israel’s aggression. Is it beyond conception that Israel took advantage of the transition of the U.S. executive branch to gain an upper hand in this struggle with Islam? Is the idea beyond reproach that an attack was conducive to Israel’s own coming elections - flexing conservative muscle to feed off fear, not unlike the impact that Tom Ridge’s convenient terror alerts had on the electorate in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election?

Meanwhile, back in Gaza, one hears the wails of discordant prayer emanating from both sides of the strip that then rise to meet the fiery setting sun, which seems stuck in time, like some celestial oracle hanging in limbo in God’s darkening sanguine sky. The true believers absorb a final moment of peaceful quietude on the Gaza front, for the sun will set on the silence when it is ripped apart by airstrike, mortar, machine gun and rocket, as wailing prayer is replaced by the caterwauls of the dying.

As these adversaries continue this holy war, I sit confounded by their conception of the Creator for whom they die, because these prayers appear misguided and perhaps have fallen on deaf ears. And on this day, I believe that the Almighty has not chosen a people, is not smiling down upon either side of the strip, and based on a past that seems present, one wonders if He ever will.

====

EDITORS’ NOTES

UPDATES: Next polemic will be posted on 2/21/09..

SIGN UP FOR ALERTS: Click on Contact Us on the left side bar and provide us with your email address so you receive our weekly CrossPolemics Alert.

COMMENTS: Please click the Post a Comment link below and tell us what YOU THINK.

====


 


Share this article with

Digg   Reddit   Twitter   Facebook    Mixx    Propeller    Poprule   Fark