COUNTER-STRIKE
Unholy Complicity
by The Counselor
“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it.”
- Hamas Charter, Preamble 18 August 1988
If nothing else, those who govern Gaza are direct. Actually, make that those who rule Gaza are direct, because, quite frankly, I’m not certain anything that Hamas does fits within even the most generous definition of governance.
Evidently loathe to alienate the attention deficit disorder community, Hamas smartly made their stated intent clear right away and chose not to risk diluting that essential message with any off-topic sentiments. Unnecessary, infidel-centric drivel like “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” was summarily excised by their editor’s scimitar. No sir. Hamas kept its preambles short and to the point.
That’s not to say, of course, that Hamas devoutly adheres to literary minimalism at all times. In fact, it generously expounded upon its preamble percept elsewhere in its charter, doing so with a bit of personifying flair: “The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews), where the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.” - Hamas Charter, Article VII.
Come to think of it, the whimsical world of talking stones and trees depicted in the Hamas Charter set the stage for Farfour the talking mouse, the star of the children’s show broadcast on Palestinian television, who so famously mimed the throwing of grenades and shooting of rifles while singing, “Oh Jerusalem, we are coming. Oh Jerusalem, it is the time of death.” Ah, the sweet innocence of childhood.
So, what do liberals do when Hamas unabashedly acts in accord with the proudly stated principles upon which it was verily founded? Naturally, they strain to re-interpret reality by projecting it through the opaque filter of moral relativism, so twisting and contorting logic in the process that even the most grizzled of Cirque du Soleil veterans takes pause to think, “wow, that’s just gotta hurt!”
Every time liberals, in the media and elsewhere, minimize the ghastly acts of Hamas by misdirecting their focus on the opined misdeeds of the Israelis, they are complicit in advancing Hamas’ cause. Lest we forget, again, that “cause” is the slaughter of the Jews and the destruction of Israel. Oh, and the definition of said “cause” is not up for debate or, as obfuscating liberals like to say, “interpretation;” rather, just read the charter. Or ask Farfour.
Liberals should be asking somebody for a quick history lesson because their tired mantra about how the Palestinians are simply trying to go return to their homeland, so rudely snatched from them and used to bring to life the figment of a Jewish state by guilt-ridden Europeans at the end of World War II, is a blatant fallacy. A quick flip through any history book published outside the Tehran city limits reveals that there has not been any singular or independent country known as “Palestine” … but only for the last 5500 years or so.
In fact, most of the current Middle Eastern nations, as well as those in northern Africa, can only trace their names and borders back to the past hundred years or so, and can attribute same to the cartographic whims of the English and French. So the whole Palestinian homeland argument really lacks historical foundation. Naturally, there are those who will insist on ignoring such inconvenient truths and adamantly cling to that particular specious line of thinking. To them I say: Take your placards and get in line behind those in the “Free Mesopotamia” crowd.
Key to the liberal sophistry concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the claimed need for Israel to negotiate, which is sometimes referred to among the non-intelligentsia as the “what have you done for me lately … no, I mean really lately” approach. Essential to this technique is the skill by which one is able to shift the starting point of the time period that frames the discussion so that the Palestinians are always the last ones to have made a concession, no matter how insignificant or how inconsistent it was with their prior acts.
Perhaps the larger question, though, is just how the Israelis are supposed to negotiate with an entity whose sole purpose in existence is the stated destruction of Israel. I’m not entirely certain where the compromise point is in that scenario, unless science has, unbeknownst to me, recently figured out how to make people half-dead.
The negotiation argument is even more laughable when one considers that Israel has been the only side actually giving up anything tangible in the discussions. Israel cedes territory and in exchange for the Palestinian promise not to murder quite as many Israelis. Over the years, Israel has given up portions of the West Bank and all of Gaza, and forcibly removed its citizen settlers in the process. In return, the Palestinians gave up the distant, strategically-undesirable locations for their Qassam rocket launch pads for more proximal sites from which they could hit targets much deeper into Israeli territory. Tough break, Hamas.
Other Arab nations support their so-called brothers in solidarity not with open arms in providing them a place to settle and prosper, but simply with arms, using them as pawns in their proxy war against the hated Israelis. No one disputes that weapons camouflaged as supplies are systematically smuggled into Gaza. Any rational nation even remotely interested in maintaining the security of its people would act to prevent such smuggling. Yet every time liberals blame Israeli blockades of supplies into Gaza for the lack of food or medicine available to the Palestinian people, they merely encourage Hamas to continue its tactic of sacrificing its people to gain international editorial support.
Even when Israel shows remarkable restraint … 2000 rocket attacks’ worth … before invading Gaza to stop the unyielding barrage of terror launched against its citizens, liberals focus instead on the inequitable casualty count. This serves only to redouble the will of Hamas to throw its citizens into the line of fire.
What the world should be doing is condemning and isolating Hamas for its every action. Yes, Virginia, there are bad guys, and Hamas should be called just that. After all, this is a group that purposely, and sometimes forcibly, herds women and children into the schools, hospitals and mosques from which it will launch attacks against the Israelis, eagerly anticipating the counterstrike that is sure to follow so it can parade the civilian casualties before the cameras of the fawning media in an attempt to curry favor and generate sympathy in the ethereal court of world opinion. Sick, yes. Sadly, successful too.


